Wednesday, October 31, 2012

Independent Research Project


Big Brother is a television series that started in 2001 it has become a world wide phenomenon, in many countries, in particular being Australia. Big brother started in Australia in 2001 by Channel Ten and ran for eight season before it was later cancelled in 2008 and then brought out by the Win Network, where in 2012 it has aired it first season with the new network

Big Brother look at social interaction of multiple housemates, each coming from different backgrounds, cultures and generation, and how they all interact and get long when they are all contained in the one house where they are unable to leave or have any interaction with the outside world for up to three months. The producers of the show choose contestants from a large number of individuals who apply, the choose contestants on how they are going to interact with other, what qualities they have, also choose particular contestants that they feel are going to cause a stir or draw attention with the intention of drawing in viewer and rating towards the show, to have a successful show.

Big brother is manly made up 5 main components: back to basic environment, isolation from the outside world, evictions, diary room and weekly tasks

Big brother from a sociological perspective allows for the opportunity of analysis oh how people react and interact when they are placed into a close confinement, with people who they may not interact with other who are outside there comfort zone.

These individuals may hold different values, opinions or ideals or even just be a different type of person who they would normally interact with on the outside world

The format is ideally suited to such analysis because us as the viewer is afforded the opportunity to see how a person reacts on the outside through the constant recording of their actions and also what they feel on the inside through the Diary Room The results can range from violent or angry confrontations to genuine and tender, providing entertainment to the public.

 

The interactions that are constructed between individuals can be seen as scripted, as we as individuals with out even realising we are submitting ourselves to obey expected norms, codes and obligations that is expected our us by other may it be society, family or our culture, we following these norms, codes and obligations as we feel that by abiding by these we as individuals are presenting ourselves as an appropriate ‘self’ to others around us may in be in our own family or society, and in this case the way housemates present themselves to other house mates in the house, to create the perception of them ‘self’ (Giddens, 1972, pg. 115)

our body language itself is a representation of our self that we can portray with out even having interaction with another individual, through the way we use body language we can portray what type of person we are, if we are easily approachable, if we are a person who is confident in ourselves, or if we are feeling an particular emotion that we may be seen as expressing through our body language.

 

·        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vJ2z2cJnPWM

This clip of natural occurring data from Big Brother 2008, Looks at two housemates and an issue that they have had with each other in the house and the effect of these issues building up and when one leaves the house and has the ability to effect the others time in the house does so on a very personal level, that may not normally effect all individuals in the same way it effects this housemate, but to this one effects the on a high level

 

Saxon letting of the hand grenade that is part of one of the tasks that are set out in the big brother house

In the above scene from big brother it can be seen the effect that is had on Bridgette , after it has been announced by Saxon that he has the power to remove all her possessions, from her clothes to her prized possession ‘Princess Sparkles’ a stuffed toy unicorn, Bridgette then expresses emotion through tears, and anger , and sarcasm. She is extremely distort as she has lost everything that she has in the house, they are things that she feels make up her image of her ‘self’ from her make up, to her clothes, to her toy unicorn

This is what Bridgette feels make up her image of her ‘self’ and gives her confidence. She is in the house under Big Brothers rules so it unable to leave as as she is under his control and therefore he has the right to remove her belongings as it is part of the Television show and its components.

 

Bridgette then turns into anger against Saxon, and wants to leave the house to get back at him

 

‘’There is more to you then what you, than just what you wear’’

 

From Bridgette not having her clothes, her whole image of her self has changed, as she feels out of character without her clothes and possessions.

 

Through this interaction it can be seen through one persons action how it can changes another individual so much from some thing as simple as not having her clothes, to leading her to be unhappy, and have severe anger towards Saxon of who she then starts throwing indults at to justify what he has done, and try to reassure her self, that he is feeling pain too, like her

 

In particular this exchange has caught my attention as it shows the different stages she goes through from being raged, to upset to then anger and even revenge wanted against Saxon when she leaves the house. It also shows how she potrays her ‘self’ and that she feels by all her personal belongings being gone that she can not be herself and is no longer comfortable.

There is no really language framed in this scene as it is a show that is a live show that just shows the lives of indivduals living in a confined space. It can be seen that there is speration of ‘teams’ in the Big Brother house, as when Saxon is broadcasting his speech to the house, he stated indivduals along with Bridgette in the house that he had issues with and reasons why he was going to use the hand grenade on them but chose Bridgette. It then goes ton to show teams, when Bridgette is raged about what has happpned she goes around the house and different housemates approach her trying to comfort her. Bridgette deploys raged, to upset to then anger and even revenge, this is deployed through her language, expressions and clearly through her body language, of where she trys to bring out her anger and then by passing back and forth outside the diary room

 

The interacton can be seen as a power struggle as in the big brother house Saxon had an amout of power with the  hand greande that he was still able to use when he left the Big Brother house, resulting in causing all the issues, but there is also a power struggle by all housemates, due to they are all adults who enter the house who control there own lives, but when in the house , Big Brother has all control over ther lives from what they eat to what they do, to what they can have,even if it may be there own personal belongings

 

 

Cyber self the selfing project goes online by Laura Robinson: Robinson says that we are developing a parallel of yourself when we are creating a cyber-profile as it is seen to be more appealing to have a parallel self that is not like their biological self- this is like big brother in a sense because they people who are in the house are not exactly the true people they are on the outside work as the are in isolation and can create the own parallel identity when entering the house as the other in the house are not aware on who they really are on the outside world and if who they say are and there background really matches up to be the truth

 

In the reading of Goff man- performances – the presentation of self in everyday life: It looks at the actual self and how we present ourselves may it be front stage or backstage

We change ourselves at times without being social conscience to make ourselves fit in and other times we change ourselves to what we would rather be put on a mask when we are at work or with friends and each mask can be very different as it may not be the person we are in everyday life. We put on these mask to ensure that we can do our job to our best our ability and until someone points it out in a cases like this we do not realise the difference and what attributes we withhold in different circumstances.

 

Yes as Goffman argues ‘we are always wearing masks in order to make it to the highest point possible in the social ladder’. This is a true point as through this we, sometimes push ourselves further a work as an example to ensure we can get further in life or where we want to be. Good point being that it is our truer self and the person that we want to be and by putting on mask in some cases helps us to show our true self in everyday life.

 

This can be clearly seen in the Big Brother house that they could be creting another version of themselves that they only show in the house, as other house mated would not know what is true or not, until they get to know them better or till they leave the house and see who they are in the outside world. They could make up a whole new identity to potray of themselves, or leave out factors such as that they have a partner in the outside world

 

In conclusion it can be seen that they ways in which indivduals interact with can bw scripted in the sense that we are aaware of the situations in am modify our ‘self’ to fitin aswell at the same time tstill construct to the norms and expectations of society. In the case of the Big Brother house, you can only be scripted to an certain extent as your are being watched every moment of the day by the outside world, aswell as living in a restricted unfamiliar space with 12 housemates that gradually decreases, may you feel comfortable with them or not, you cannot put on a ‘show’ all of the time and as in the Bridgette case just have an outbreak where there is a drastic change or something upset you.

 

 

 

 

 

 

References:

·        "Big Brother", 2002, Television & New Media, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 251-254.

 

·        Wieder, D. Laurence. 1974. “Telling the Code.” Pp. 144-172 in Ethnomethodology, edited by Roy Turner. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

 

·         BIG BROTHER 2012, News Digital Media, Southport, Qld.

 

·        Goffman, Erving. 1971. “Performances.” The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, Harmondsworth, Penguin.

 

·        Giddens, A. 1972, Emile Durkheim: Selected Writing, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

 

·        Roscoe, J. 2001, "Big Brother Australia: performing the "real" twenty-four-seven", International Journal of Cultural Studies, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 473-488.

 

 

·        Smyth, R., Plange, N. & Burdess, N. 1997, "Big brother? Australia's image in the south pacific", Australian Journal of International Affairs, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 37-52.

 

·        Chris Berg & Hugh Tobin 2007, "Big Brother vs. Big Brother", Review - Institute of Public Affairs, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 32.

 

·        Robinson, Laura 2007 ‘The Cyberself: the self-ing project goes online, symbolic interaction in the digital age’ New Media and Society, vol 9 no. 1: pp. 93- 110

 

·        Goffman, Erving. 1967. “The Nature of Deference and Demeanour.” Pp. 47-96 in Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behaviour. New York: Pantheon Books.

 

 

Wednesday, October 3, 2012

'thongs or thongs?'


We all use different types of language every day to express ourselves May it be formal, informal. slang or in some cases our own language that only selected people understand

Each culture has uses and interrupts language in their own way, may it be as simple as Australians we know that ‘thongs’ are an item that we as Australians where on our feet, where ‘thongs’ in other countries all over the world can be interrupted as an item of underwear, and ‘thongs’, as in the footwear are known as ‘flip-flops’ this can be seen as a case where if you were talking and just saying thongs in your conversation could be very easily miss-interrupted or even taken inappropriately .

Wierzbicka’s reading, discusses the word "bloody", and how it is casually thrown around in everyday Australian slang and how we know the way in which this term in meant but to other who are not familiar with Australian culture could easily take it very wrong.  This was seen in the last few years n where there was a tourist ad campaign put forward to attract people to Australia with an ad showing Lara Bingle an autralian standing  on a beach with the line’ where the bloody hell are you’. This ad was not released all over the world to attract tourism to Australia as it was felt that the term bloody, depicted the wrong image and opionion of Australian’s.

Each culture has their own language and there is a fine line is some cases for the meaning to be depicted wrong

Sunday, September 9, 2012

mask of true self response


Response to Jo Damcevski- Mask of True Self Post

Jo Damcevski you have, made a very god point here, and it is true we do put on a mask when we are at work or with friends and each mask can be very different as it may not be the person we are in every day life. We put on these mask to ensure that we can do our job to our best our ability and until some one points it out in a cases like this we do not realise the difference and what attributes we withhold in different circumstances.

Yes as Goffman argues ‘we are always wearing masks in order to make it to the highest point possible in the social ladder’. This is a true point as through this we, sometimes push ourselves further a work as an example to ensure we can get further in life or where we want to be. Good point being that it is our truer self and the person that we want to be and by putting on mask in some cases helps us to show our true self in everyday life.

Monday, September 3, 2012

Performances blog


Second blog of semester

Found this week tutorials very interesting with the first data discussion presentation being completed and it looked at ‘ Performances’ and with reference to Goffmans reading.

The data discussion looked at performances in relation to the reality television show ‘Toddlers and Tiaras’ and how they the show is primarily based around mother who are living through there daughter and in a way constructing there daughter to be what they want them to be or wish themselves where and then conducting the daughters like puppets to perform in particular ways. In extreme cases even giving there daughters ‘stage names’ so they know when they have to act as them themselves and when they need to act, dance, and smile and walk a certain way etc.

Goffman talked about face work and this is clearly present in this realty show as both the mother and daughter and putting n an ‘act’ and performing not only for the camera and the judges, but for all the other participant of the pageants and there family and friends. This is clearly present in the segment we watched in class that contained a mother ‘Mellissa’ and her daughter ‘Carly’, whose stage name was ‘Darla’ and when the show was being filmed she was going up to daughter instructing her how to act for camera and that if she does not she will be punished and in this particular case will lose her iPod. Carly is only 4 years old and her mother Mellissa feel they are the same person as she is instructing her to ‘Perform’